Batumike et al. (“Affaire Kavumu”), RPA N° 139/2018 - Democratic Republic of the Congo
Background
This was an appeal of convictions obtained before a special sitting of the Military Court of Bukavu in December 2017. The trial court had found that the 11 defendants were members of a militia known as Jeshi La Yesu, which was active in the region of South Kivu under the leadership of a provincial lawmaker, Frédéric Batumike, and many of the charges on which they were convicted were related to acts of insurrection and attacks on the Congolese armed forces and local political figures. The most significant aspect of the case from a children’s-rights perspective was the conviction of Batumike and ten others for rape as a crime against humanity arising out of the militia’s practice, between 2013 and 2016, of kidnapping very young girls (aged 18 months to ten years) in Kavumu and raping them in order to gather their blood for its supposed ritual power to make them impervious to bullets.
Civil society groups had a fundamental role in this case. Local actors (leaders of local associations, teachers, lawyers, NGO representatives and human rights defenders) advocated for international actors and the State to get involved in the case, denounced and documented the violations and stood alongside with the victims. Experts from international organisations, among which Physicians for Human Rights (PHR) and Trial International, collaborated with local experts in the investigations and in building and defending the case.
Reasoning
The High Military Court upheld the convictions of all 11 defendants found guilty of rape as a crime against humanity as defined in Article 7.1(g) of the Rome Statute of the International Criminal Court. The Court held that the rapes could be prosecuted as a “widespread and systematic” crime against humanity even though they occurred at different times over a period of years, as long as they were part of “a plan conceived to further the policy decreed by” the militia (p. 63). The Court also recognized that all members of the militia could be criminally liable provided that one member was involved in an act that was part of the “plan” of the larger organization (p. 73).
Remedy
The High Military Court upheld the sentence of penal servitude for life for all 11 defendants found guilty of rape as a crime against humanity. It also upheld the trial court’s award of compensation in an amount equivalent to 5,000 USD to each of the 37 child victims. The Court, however, rejected the victims’ request that it hold the Congolese state civilly liable, partly on the grounds that the state was itself engaged in armed conflict with Jeshi La Yesu and that the militia had attacked Congolese soldiers.
Role of children
Local clinicians, supported by Physicians for Human Rights (PHR) and Trial International, conducted forensic examinations of the victims and recorded their testimonies out of court following child-protective best practices. The case represented one of the first uses of such protections in the DRC.
Enforcement and other outcomes
The High Military Court recognized and explicitly ordered financial compensation to be paid to the child victims for the serious physical, emotional, and developmental harms they suffered (p. 74). Each of the victims was awarded compensation in an amount equivalent to 5,000 USD by the trial court, and this award was upheld by the High Military Court. The severity of the sentences given to the defendants and the High Military Court’s reaffirmation that their crimes met the thresholds of gravity and systematicity to constitute crimes against humanity under the Rome Statute represent a significant contribution to both Congolese and international criminal case law. Concerns remain, however, as to the ability of the victims to recover the sums awarded to them from defendants who lack the financial means to pay.
Significance of the case from a CRSL perspective
The case represented a reaffirmation of the dignity and welfare interests of the young girls of Kavumu. The High Military Court recognized not only the physical but also the emotional and developmental harms inflicted on the victims, including stigmatization, loss of self-esteem, impaired personal development, and poor school performance.
The case, built on the multisectoral work of several civil society organisations, which collected evidence and promoted, carried out investigations into the crimes committed by the armed militia and advocated for these to be investigated by the authorities. The case also included a groundbreaking use of medico-legal best practices. Trainings offered by Physicians for Human Rights (PHR) through its Programme on Sexual Violence in Conflict Zones helped professionals from Panzi General Hospital to document the findings from the victims. Physicians for Human Rights (PHR) also mobilized a task force formed by civil society stakeholders, such as health professionals and lawyers, police officers, local community activists, local non-governmental organisations, MONUSCO and Trial International, and facilitated expert consultations to support the forensic evaluations and the police investigations. The local movement V-Men, led by local health professionals from the Panzi Hospital, carried out an awareness-raising campaign. Physicians for Human Rights (PHR) and Trial International organized a consultation with 36 child victims with the support of paediatric psychologists and physicians authorized by the Court, through which they collected video interviews, following strict procedures to ensure that children were not retraumatised and obtaining informed consent at every stage of the process, which served in the place of the children’s appearance in Court.
Finally, the case represents a strong precedent both in the DRC and worldwide for the use of international criminal law and significant domestic criminal sanctions to punish widespread and serious harms to children by armed groups. The conviction of Batumike was the first conviction of a sitting lawmaker in the DCR for sexual violence as a crime against humanity and resulted from a decision from the Court to strip him of his parliamentary immunity. Both the trial court’s verdict and the High Military Court’s decision were heavily publicized as examples of the fight against impunity and models for the successful prosecution of similar cases in the future.
Country
Democratic Republic of the Congo
Forum and date of decision
High Military Court
July 26, 2018
CRC provisions and other international law provisions/sources
Rome Statute of the International Criminal Court, Articles 7.1(g), 25.3, and 77
Domestic law provisions
Constitution of the Democratic Republic of Congo, Art. 149, and Law No. 023/2002 of 18 November 2002 which respectively entrusts the High Military Court Judicial Power and grants it competence over the matters at law
Law No. 15/022 of 31 January 2015 which inserts the Rome Statute into Congolese domestic law and thereby introduces the notion of genocide, crime against humanity, and war crimes
Congolese criminal code, Articles 21 and 222.8
Military criminal code, Arts. 7, 136, 137 and 138
Related information
The applicants:
State of the Democratic Republic of Congo
The Military Prosecutor
42 plaintiffs whose identity is not revealed to protect their privacy right; the claim is litigated under pseudonyms
The defendants:
F. Batumike Rugimbanya
J. M. Lwaboshi Mulimbwa
J. Magadju Masirika
L. Mobutu Cibinda Basoda
E. M. Mushagalusa Mirindi Musale
P. Safari Kalere
J. Bufole Bulimbi
L. Ciza Cishagara
L. Mugaruka Bunane
N. Polepole
P. O. Zirimingi Mirindi
P. Chiamboki Malira
K. Shamavu Mutera
C. Zihindula Moussa
B. Imani Malinda
J. Shamanvu Midero
I. Sumahili Zairois
G. Ngufu Mudugu
J. Malashi
D. Mushobekwa Muhanzi
Civil Society Organisations that supported the victims:
Rue de Lyon 95
1203 Geneva
Switzerland
256 W 38th Street, 9th Floor
New York, NY 10018
Panzi Hospital and Dr. Denis Mukwege
Bukavu
Democratic Republic of the Congo
Case documents
Batumike et al. (“Affaire Kavumu”), RPA N° 139/2018 (in French)
Secondary documents
TRIAL International, “Kavumu Trial: High Military Court Confirms All Condemnations,” July 26, 2018. <https://trialinternational.org/latest-post/kavumu-hmc-confirms-all-condemnations/>
TRIAL International, “Kavumu Case: The Key Role of Local Actors,” Jan. 23, 2018. Available at <https://trialinternational.org/latest-post/kavumu-case-the-key-role-of-local-actors/>
TRIAL International, “Justice is Delivered for the Children of Kavumu,” Dec. 13, 2017. Available at <https://trialinternational.org/latest-post/justice-is-delivered-for-the-children-of-kavumu/>
TRIAL International, “Kavumu Case: Young Girls Abducted at Night and Raped,” Oct. 13, 2017. Available at <https://trialinternational.org/latest-post/kavumu-case-young-girls-abducted-at-night-and-raped/>
Physicians for Human Rights, “Medical-Legal Collaboration Leads to Justice in Serial Rape Case in Democratic Republic of the Congo,” June 19, 2019. Available at <https://phr.org/news/medical-legal-collaboration-leads-to-justice-in-serial-rape-case-in-democratic-republic-of-the-congo/>